2014-0541921E5 Whether a contingent amount is an excluded obligation?

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.

Principal Issues: Whether a contingent amount under the definition of this term in subsection 143.4(1) would be considered an excluded obligation within the meaning of the definition of this term in subsection 80(1)?

Position: Generally yes.

Reasons: Based on our response to Q. 15 of the 2014 APFF.

Author: Gibbons, Jim
Section: 143.4(1); 80(1)

XXXXXXXXXX
                                                                                                                               J.Gibbons
                                                                                                                               2014-054192

January 20, 2015

Dear XXXXXXXXXX:

We are writing in response to your email dated August 1, 2014, wherein you asked for our opinion concerning the interaction between sections 143.4 and 80 of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”). 

In particular, you describe a situation where a commercial debt obligation (the “Debt”) is entered into that has an embedded right to reduce the amount payable if certain conditions are met within a year and the Debt is issued with respect to the acquisition of property (the “Property”).  You assume that this right is a “contingent amount,” as defined under subsection 143.4(1) of the Act.  As we understand it, your question is whether the debt forgiveness rules in section 80 of the Act would apply to the Debt if the Debt is later settled or extinguished.  You are concerned about double taxation since the amount of the Debt and the cost of the Property would have been reduced under subsection 143.4(1) because of the contingent amount.

Our Comments

This technical interpretation provides general comments about the provisions of the Act and related legislation.  It does not confirm the income tax treatment of a particular situation involving a specific taxpayer but is intended to assist you in making that determination.  The income tax treatment of transactions proposed by a specific taxpayer will only be confirmed by this Directorate in the context of an advance income tax ruling request submitted in the manner set out in Information Circular IC 70-6R6, Advance Income Tax Rulings and Technical Interpretations.

As indicated in the CRA’s response to question 15 of the Table Ronde Sur La Fiscalité Fédérale of the 2014 APFF (l'Association de planification fiscale et financière), a contingent amount under subsection 143.4(1) of the Act would generally fall under the definition of an “excluded obligation” in subsection 80(1) of the Act.  More specifically, it would appear that subparagraphs (a)(ii) and (iii) of the definition of an excluded obligation would generally apply.  Subparagraphs (a)(ii) and (iii) describe, respectively, an obligation the proceeds of which “were deducted in computing, for the purposes of this Act, any balance of undeducted outlays, expenses or other amounts” or “were deducted in computing the capital cost or cost amount to the debtor of any property of the debtor.”

An excluded obligation is included under paragraph (j) of amount “B” in the definition of a “forgiven amount” in subsection 80(1).  This paragraph provides as follows:

“[S]uch portion of the principal amount of the obligation as represents the principal amount of an excluded obligation.”

It should be noted that amount B is deducted from the forgiven amount otherwise determined.    Accordingly, a contingent amount that qualifies as an excluded obligation would reduce the forgiven amount otherwise determined. This should avoid any double taxation that may arise as a result of the interaction between section 80 and section 143.4 of the Act.

We trust our comments will be of assistance.

Yours truly,

 

G. Moore
For Director
International Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch

All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2015

Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistribuer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de façon électronique, mécanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2015


Video Tax News is a proud commercial publisher of Canada Revenue Agency's Technical Interpretations. To support you, our valued clients and your network of entrepreneurial, small businesses, we choose to offer this valuable resource to Canadian tax professionals free of charge.

For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses see the Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter. This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and your clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way. Packages start at $400/year.