2015-0599021E5 Establishment of a MIC
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: Whether a corporation would qualify as a mortgage investment corporation if it is wholly-owned by a publicly traded holdco
Position: No.
Reasons: Paragraph 130.1(6)(d) requires that there be a minimum of 20 shareholders of which none would hold more than 25% of the shares of any class of the capital stock of the corporation.
Author:
Omstead, Jennifer
Section:
130.1(6), 248(1) "specified shareholder"
XXXXXXXXXX
Jennifer Omstead
2015-059902
October 26, 2015
Dear XXXXXXXXXX:
Re: Establishment of a Mortgage Investment Corporation
This is in response to your letter of July 15, 2015 concerning the establishment of a corporation and the conditions that must be met in order for that corporation to qualify as a mortgage investment corporation (“MIC”) for income tax purposes.
You described a hypothetical corporate structure whereby a parent corporation that is publicly traded on a Canadian stock exchange would wholly own several corporations providing financial services and wealth management offerings. The desired outcome is that one of these corporations would meet the conditions to be considered a MIC. In particular, you asked for our views on whether the shareholding test in paragraph 130.1(6)(d) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) would be met in the circumstances described. If the answer to this question is negative, you asked whether our response would be different if there was a share ownership limitation placed on the publicly traded parent corporation of no more than 25%.
Our comments
This technical interpretation provides general comments about the provisions of the Act and related legislation (where referenced). It does not confirm the income tax treatment of a particular situation involving a specific taxpayer but is intended to assist you in making that determination. The income tax treatment of particular transactions proposed by a specific taxpayer will only be confirmed by this Directorate in the context of an advance income tax ruling request submitted in the manner set out in Information Circular IC 70-6R6, Advance Income Tax Rulings and Technical Interpretations.
To qualify as a MIC for purposes of the Act, a corporation must, throughout the taxation year, meet the conditions in subsection 130.1(6) of the Act. Paragraph 130.1(6)(d) of the Act requires that the number of shareholders of the corporation be not less than 20 and that no one shareholder hold, directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the issued shares of any class of the capital stock of the corporation. However, subsection 130.1(8) of the Act provides an exception which deems the corporation to have complied with paragraph 130.1(6)(d) of the Act throughout the first taxation year in which it carries on business if the test in paragraph 130.1(6)(d) of the Act is met on the last day of its first taxation year.
In the situation described, it is our opinion that a corporation wholly owned by a publicly traded corporation would not meet the shareholding test in paragraph 130.1(6)(d) of the Act regardless of any share ownership limitations placed on the publicly traded parent corporation. In our view, the conditions in paragraph 130.1(6)(d) of the Act are directed at the shareholdings of the corporation itself and not its parent corporation. As a result, the wholly-owned subsidiary would not qualify as a MIC.
We trust that these comments will be of assistance.
Yours truly,
Jenie Leigh
Manager
Financial Institutions Section
Financial Industries and Trusts Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistribuer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de façon électronique, mécanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2016
Video Tax News is a proud commercial publisher of Canada Revenue Agency's Technical Interpretations. To support you, our valued clients and your network of entrepreneurial, small businesses, we choose to offer this valuable resource to Canadian tax professionals free of charge.
For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses see the Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter. This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and your clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way. Packages start at $400/year.