2015-0608211E5 Assignment of right to purchase

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.

Principal Issues: Whether an assignment to a trust by a non-resident person of the right to purchase an apartment would be considered a disposition of taxable Canadian property.

Position: Yes, unless the specific exceptions to the definition of "disposition" apply.

Reasons: The definition of "taxable Canadian property" and "disposition" under subsection 248(1).

Author: Tu, Grace
Section: 248(1)

XXXXXXXXXX                                2015-060821

                                                        Grace Tu, CPA CA
                                                        (604) 362-2718

March 7, 2016

Dear XXXXXXXXXX

Re: Assignment of right to purchase an apartment unit to a trust

We are writing in response to your letter dated August 17, 2015 wherein you requested our comments regarding whether an assignment to a trust by a non-resident person of a right to purchase an apartment unit in XXXXXXXXXX would be considered a disposition of taxable Canadian property for purposes of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”).

Our comments

This technical interpretation provides general comments about the provisions of the Act.  It does not confirm the income tax treatment of a particular situation but is intended to assist you in making that determination.  The income tax treatment of transactions will only be confirmed by this Directorate in the context of an advance income tax ruling request submitted in the manner set out in Information Circular IC 70-6R6, Advance Income Tax Rulings and Technical Interpretations.

The term “taxable Canadian property” is defined in subsection 248(1) of the Act. According to paragraph (f) of the definition, a taxable Canadian property includes an option in respect of a real property situated in Canada, whether or not the property exists.

The term “option” is not defined in the Act, other than for limited purposes of section 143.3. According to Black's Law Dictionary 9th Ed, “option” includes the right to buy an asset at a fixed price within a specified time. Based on this definition, the right to purchase an apartment should be considered an option for purposes of the Act.

The phrase “in respect of” has been interpreted by the case law (Nowegijick v. The Queen [1983] CTC 20) to be the widest of any expressions intended to convey the connection between two subject matters. Therefore, the right to purchase in the present case should be considered an option in respect of the apartment unit. Further, since the apartment is a real property and it is situated in Canada, the right to purchase the apartment in the present case should be considered an option in respect of a real property situated in Canada.

Based on above, the right to purchase the apartment unit would be considered a taxable Canadian property.

Whether or not an assignment of the right to a trust would be considered a disposition should be determined based on the definition of “disposition” in subsection 248(1) of the Act and all relevant facts.  In this regard, paragraph (c) of the definition considers any transfer of the property to a trust to be a disposition. In our view, “assignment” is a form of “transfer”, and therefore, provided all other conditions of the definition are met, the assignment of the right to purchase the apartment to a trust would be considered a disposition.

We trust our comments will be of assistance.

Yours truly,

 

Vitaliy Anissimov
Section Manager
For Division Director
International Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate

All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016

Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistribuer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de façon électronique, mécanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2016


Video Tax News is a proud commercial publisher of Canada Revenue Agency's Technical Interpretations. To support you, our valued clients and your network of entrepreneurial, small businesses, we choose to offer this valuable resource to Canadian tax professionals free of charge.

For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses see the Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter. This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and your clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way. Packages start at $400/year.