2016-0674541E5 Mineral Certification

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.

Principal Issues: Whether the nephrite jade deposits at issue meet the definition of mineral resource as per subparagraph (d)(i) of the definition of this term in ss. 248(1)

Position: No new certification is provided for in-situ deposits on the Property that are covered under a previous mineral resource certification. Other in-situ deposits on the Property qualify as mineral resource. Placer nephrite deposits on the Property do not qualify as mineral resource. Nephrite deposits located in claim areas where in-situ and placer deposits geographically overlap do not qualify as mineral resource.

Reasons: Opinion of NRCan

Author: Christov, Boriana
Section: Definition of mineral resource under subparagraph (d)(i) of ss. 248(1)

XXXXXXXXXX                                                                                                           2016-067454
                                                                                                                                   Boriana Christov
June 16, 2017

Dear XXXXXXXXXX:

Re. Mineral Certification – XXXXXXXXXX

We are writing with respect to a request made on behalf of XXXXXXXXXX. (the “Company”) for certification pursuant to subparagraph (d)(i) of the definition “mineral resource” in subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act ( the “Act”) with respect to nephrite deposits at the Company’s XXXXXXXXXX (the “Property”).

The Company owns permits to XXXXXXXXXX both mineral and placer claims covering an area of approximately XXXXXXXXXX. The Property is located in XXXXXXXXXX.

The Minister of Natural Resources has advised that the principal mineral, nephrite, to be extracted from the in-situ deposits located on the Property is an industrial mineral contained in non-bedded deposits, excluding:

1.    XXXXXXXXXX in-situ deposits, named XXXXXXXXXX found in XXXXXXXXXX part of claim XXXXXXXXXX which are covered under a previous mineral resource certification; and

2.    claim areas where the in-situ and placer deposits geographically overlap.

Furthermore, the Minister of Natural Resources has advised that the placer nephrite deposits on the Property fail to meet the definition of an industrial mineral contained in non-bedded deposits.

It is therefore our view that the nephrite in-situ deposits on the Property will qualify as a mineral resource pursuant to subparagraph (d)(i) of the definition of this term in subsection 248(1) of the Act, excluding in-situ deposits, named XXXXXXXXXX and the following claim areas:

1.    claim XXXXXXXXXX; and

2.    the parts of claim XXXXXXXXXX found within the XXXXXXXXXX.

Moreover, it is our view that the placer nephrite deposits on the Property do not qualify as a mineral resource pursuant to the definition of this term in subsection 248(1) of the Act.

Furthermore, it is our understanding that expenses may be incurred by the Company near existing mines on the Property. In this regard, we note that by virtue of subparagraph (f)(vi) of the definition of “Canadian exploration expense” in subsection 66.1(6) of the Act, any expense that may reasonably be considered to be related to a mine that has come into production in reasonable commercial quantities or to be related to a potential or actual extension of the mine will not qualify as Canadian exploration expense.

Yours truly,

 

Nicolas Bilodeau
Acting Manager
Resources Section
Reorganizations Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch

All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2017

Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistribuer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de façon électronique, mécanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2017


Video Tax News is a proud commercial publisher of Canada Revenue Agency's Technical Interpretations. To support you, our valued clients and your network of entrepreneurial, small businesses, we choose to offer this valuable resource to Canadian tax professionals free of charge.

For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses see the Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter. This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and your clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way. Packages start at $400/year.