Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: Whether a qualified subchapter S Corporation subsidiary (QSSS) must enter into a separate Competent Authority Agreement under paragraph 5 of Article XXIX of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention in a situation where the parent United States S Corporation has already entered into such an agreement.
Reasons: The income of the parent United States S Corporation as computed under the Internal Revenue Code and which is deemed to be FAPI pursuant to a “Paragraph 5 Article XXIX Competent Authority Agreement” includes the income of the QSSS.
Author: Laurikainen, Olli
Section: Paragraph 5 of Article XXIX of the Canada-U.S. Tax Convention
STEP CRA Roundtable – June 13, 2017
QUESTION 9. Paragraph 5 of Article XXIX – procedures for Qualified Subchapter S Corporation Subsidiary
Under paragraph 5 of Article XXIX of the Canada-US Tax Convention (the “Convention”), the Competent Authority of Canada may agree to allow a Canadian-resident shareholder of a United States S Corporation to apply the following rules for Canadian tax purposes with respect to the period during which the agreement is effective:
a) the corporation shall be deemed to be a controlled foreign affiliate of the person;
b) all the income of the corporation shall be deemed to be foreign accrual property income;
c) for the purposes of subsection 20(11) of the Income Tax Act, the amount of the corporation’s income that is included in the person’s income shall be deemed not to be income from a property; and
d) each dividend paid to the person on a share of the capital stock of the corporation shall be excluded from the person’s income and shall be deducted in computing the adjusted cost base to the person of the share.
The cumulative effect of these rules synchronizes the recognition of income in Canada with that of the US and allows the shareholder to claim a foreign tax credit in respect of the amount of US tax paid on his or her share of the S Corporation’s income. However, paragraph 5 of Article XXIX of the Convention does not apply automatically. It only applies to a shareholder of an S Corporation who requests and enters into an S Corporation Agreement with the Canadian Competent Authority. Additionally, if the shareholder has an interest in more than one S Corporation, a separate S Corporation Agreement is required for each corporation. This was recently confirmed by the CRA at the 2015 STEP CRA Roundtable.
Can the CRA comment on the situation of an S Corporation that holds the shares of a qualified subchapter S Corporation subsidiary (“QSSS”). A QSSS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an S Corporation for which a separate U.S. tax election is made to treat it as a pass-through entity. In such situation, is the Canadian-resident shareholder of the S Corporation required to enter into two separate S Corporation Agreements: one with respect to the parent S Corporation and the other with respect to the QSSS? Or would the S Corporation Agreement for the parent S Corporation automatically cover the QSSS?
It is our understanding that when an S Corporation elects under the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) of the United States to treat one of its subsidiaries as a QSSS, the QSSS is no longer treated as a separate corporation under the Code and the items of income and deduction of the QSSS are treated as those of the S-Corporation. The template S Corporation Agreement used by the Canadian Competent Authority provides that the income of an S Corporation that is deemed to be foreign accrual property income as described in paragraph (b) above is to be determined in accordance with the Code. On that basis, if the shareholder of an S-Corporation in the circumstances described above has entered into an S Corporation Agreement with the Canadian Competent Authority, the income of the S-Corporation as computed under the Code, which will include the income of its QSSS, is deemed to be foreign accrual property income. If that is the case, there is no need for the Canadian shareholder to enter into a separate S-Corporation agreement with respect to the QSSS.
Response prepared in collaboration with:
Competent Authority Services Division
International, Large Business and Investigations Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2017
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2017
For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses, see Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter.
This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way.
Packages start at $399/year.