2017-0722961E5 Winding-up of a partnership
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: After the transfer of the business assets of a partnership in favour of a new corporation using the rules provided for in subsection 85(2), whether subsection 98(5) could apply with respect to those business assets in a situation where a former member of the partnership amalgamates with the new corporation within three months of the winding-up of the partnership.
Position: Subsection 98(5) would not apply with respect to the business assets that were transferred to the new corporation pursuant to subsection 85(2).
Reasons: The corporate entity formed as a result of the amalgamation would not be a member of the partnership immediately before the partnership has ceased to exist.
Author:
Labarre, Sylvie
Section:
85(2); 85(3); 98(5)
XXXXXXXXXX 2017-072296
Sylvie Labarre, CPA, CA
January 15, 2018
XXXXXXXXXX,
Re: Winding-up of a partnership
This is in reply to your letter of September 18, 2017 in which you requested a clarification regarding the interaction between subsections 98(5) and 85(3) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) on the winding-up of a Canadian partnership (the “Partnership”).
All references to sections or components of a statute are references to the Act unless otherwise specified.
Hypothetical Facts and Assumptions
1. GPCo and LPCo are private corporations as defined in section 89.
2. GPCo is wholly-owned by LPCo.
3. GPCo is a general partner holding a 0.01% interest in the Partnership and LPCo is a limited partner holding a 99.99% interest in the Partnership.
4. The assets owned by the Partnership include assets of an operating business (the “Business Assets”).
5. The Partnership creates a new corporation (“Newco”).
6. Immediately following the creation of Newco, the Partnership will transfer the Business Assets to Newco on a fully tax-deferred basis under subsection 85(2) (the “85(2) Transfer”) such that the Partnership will dispose of the Business Assets in favour of Newco and, as consideration, the Partnership will receive shares in the capital stock of Newco having a value equal to the fair market value (“FMV”) of the assets so transferred (“Newco Shares”). In order to ensure the application of subsection 85(2) to the 85(2) Transfer, GPCo, LPCo (as members of the Partnership) and Newco will file a joint election in prescribed form and within the prescribed time frame.
7. As a consequence of the 85(2) Transfer, the Partnership will be the true and beneficial owner of the Newco Shares and Newco will be the true and beneficial owner of the Business Assets.
8. Within sixty (60) days following the 85(2) Transfer, the affairs of the Partnership will be wound-up (the “Winding-up”) and immediately before the Winding-up, the only assets held by the Partnership will be the Newco Shares and possibly some nominal amounts of cash.
9. Accordingly, the Newco Shares and the nominal amount of cash (if any) will be distributed to the members of the Partnership (being GPCo and LPCo), thereby meeting the requirements of paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subsection 85(3).
10. Immediately following the Winding-up, GPCo will be liquidated into LPCo. Subsection 88(1) will apply to the winding-up of GPCo into LPCo.
11. Following the liquidation of GPCo and within the three (3) months following the Winding-up, LPCo and Newco will amalgamate, thereby causing the amalgamated entity (hereinafter “Amalco”) to directly hold the Business Assets. Subsection 87(1) will apply to the amalgamation of LPCo and Newco.
Question
You request clarification regarding the interaction between subsection 98(5) and subsection 85(3). Specifically, you would like to know whether the ownership of the Business Assets by Amalco within the three (3) months following the Winding-up would cause Amalco to be a person who was, immediately before the winding-up, a member of the partnership that carries on alone the business that was the business of the Partnership. If so, you would like to know which subsection takes precedence over the other, 98(5) or 85(3).
Our comments
This technical interpretation provides general comments about the provisions of the Act and related legislation (where referenced). It does not confirm the income tax treatment of a particular situation involving a specific taxpayer but is intended to assist you in making that determination. The income tax treatment of particular transactions proposed by a specific taxpayer will only be confirmed by this Directorate in the context of an advance income tax ruling request submitted in the manner set out in Information Circular IC70-6R7, Advance Income Tax Rulings and Technical Interpretations.
In our view, subsection 98(5) would not apply in the hypothetical scenario provided.
It is assumed that the amalgamation described in paragraph 11 of the Hypothetical Facts and Assumptions section complies with subsection 87(1). In such a case, paragraph 87(2)(a) applies. Paragraph 87(2)(a) indicates that, for the purpose of the Act, the corporate entity formed as a result of the amalgamation is deemed to be a new corporation. Therefore, for the purpose of subsection 98(5), Amalco will be a new corporation and will not be a member of the Partnership immediately before the Partnership has ceased to exist. There is nothing in section 87 that provides a continuity rule of a predecessor corporation with respect to the application of subsection 98(5). Please refer to paragraph 1.43 of Folio S4-F7-C1 – Amalgamation of Canadian Corporations in that regard.
Therefore, the conditions to apply subsection 98(5) will not be met and subsection 85(3) will apply with respect to the winding-up of the Partnership provided that all the conditions specified in that subsection are met.
We trust these comments will be helpful.
Yours truly,
Urszula Chalupa, LL.B, M. Fisc.
for Division Director
Reorganizations Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2018
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistribuer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de façon électronique, mécanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2018
Video Tax News is a proud commercial publisher of Canada Revenue Agency's Technical Interpretations. To support you, our valued clients and your network of entrepreneurial, small businesses, we choose to offer this valuable resource to Canadian tax professionals free of charge.
For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses see the Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter. This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and your clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way. Packages start at $400/year.