2020-0861061C6 CTF 2020 – Q8 - SDA and Formula-Based Plans

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.

Principal Issues: Whether the CRA will continue to consider ruling requests on whether employee incentive plans with units the value of which are determined using a formula are SDAs?

Position: No, except for ATR-45 SAR plans and plans covered by one of the enumerated SDA exceptions.

Reasons: It is not possible to be reasonably certain, at the time of a ruling request, that a formula-based appreciation plan would never become a SDA at some point in the future due to changes in the relevant facts and circumstances specific to the employee, the employer or the business environment in which it operates.

Author: Koh, Kah Foo
Section: 248(1) “salary deferral arrangement”

2020 CTF Annual Conference

CRA Roundtable

Question 8: Salary Deferral Arrangements (SDA) and Formula-Based Appreciation Plans

It is not uncommon for a private corporation to have an equity-based incentive plan under which participating employees are granted units, the value of which is determined using formulas (“formula-based appreciation plans”). These formulas often involve various future oriented financial metrics of the corporation such as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”). Units granted under such plans generally do not have any intrinsic value at the date of grant, but may increase in value over the duration of the plan, depending on the measured results. 

The CRA has previously provided favourable rulings that certain formula-based appreciation plans were not salary deferral arrangements (“SDAs”) as defined in subsection 248(1). However, we understand that the CRA will no longer consider such ruling requests. Can the CRA comment on why it has changed its practice?

CRA Response

While examining a recent ruling request on whether a proposed formula-based appreciation plan is a SDA, we encountered issues that caused us to revisit our willingness to consider such rulings requests.

One of these issues relates to the fact that the determination of whether any given incentive plan is a SDA must be made on an annual basis from the date of grant, and from the perspective of each employee participating in the plan in the context of the specific awards granted to that employee, taking into account all known facts and circumstances up to that point. It has become clear to us that it is simply not possible to be reasonably certain, at the time of a ruling request, that a formula-based appreciation plan would never become a SDA at some point in the future due to changes in the relevant facts and circumstances specific to the employee, the employer or the business environment in which it operates. 

Another issue is that such plans are vulnerable to manipulation. As we cannot reasonably account for such risk in the context of a ruling request, we believe that such a determination would be more appropriately addressed at a later stage of the compliance continuum.

As a result, the CRA will no longer consider any ruling requests relating to the determination of whether any given formula-based appreciation plan is a SDA, unless the plan is a share appreciation rights plan as described in ATR-45, or the ruling request pertains to whether one of the enumerated exceptions listed in the SDA definition applies.

This change in administrative policy does not mean that the CRA considers all formula-based appreciation plans to be SDAs. On the contrary, we accept that it is quite possible that many such plans will not be a SDA where the underlying formula closely approximates the fair market value of the relevant shares of the corporate employer over the duration of the plan. However, the CRA will no longer make such a determination in the context of a ruling request.

See technical interpretation 2020-0850281I7 for more details.

 

Kah Foo Koh
October 27, 2020
2020-086106

All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2021

Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistribuer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de façon électronique, mécanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.

© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2021


Video Tax News is a proud commercial publisher of Canada Revenue Agency's Technical Interpretations. To support you, our valued clients and your network of entrepreneurial, small businesses, we choose to offer this valuable resource to Canadian tax professionals free of charge.

For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses see the Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter. This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and your clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way. Packages start at $400/year.