2021-0913891I7 CERS - Sublease
Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: Whether a document to sublease real property is a written agreement entered into prior to October 9, 2020 when the landlord of the real property did not sign the sublease document before October 9, 2020.
Position: Question of fact.
Reasons: A “written agreement” is not defined in the Act, but under the common law. In general, a written agreement requires mutual assent of the parties to the agreement, clear intent to create a binding and enforceable contract, and all essential terms and conditions. Depending on the circumstances, a sublease that was executed without the required consent of the landlord may still be an effective and binding agreement between the sublessor and the subtenant.
Author:
Koh, Kah Foo
Section:
125.7
January 14, 2022
David Gagné-Therrien
Dedicated Telephone Service, Section I Income Tax Rulings
Canada Revenue Agency Directorate
David.Gagne-Therrien@cra-arc.gc.ca Kah Foo, Koh
2021-091389
Subject: Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy - Sublease
We are writing in response to your recent inquiry wherein you requested our views on whether a document to sublease real property would be considered a written agreement entered into prior to October 9, 2020, as required under the definition of “qualifying rent expense” (“QRE”) in subsection 125.7(1) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) for purposes of the Canada Emergency Rent Subsidy (“CERS”).
In particular, the sublessor and subtenant signed a document prior to October 9, 2020 to sublease the real property at issue. Consent of the landlord was required for the sublessor to sublease the real property. However, the landlord of the real property did not sign the document until October 9, 2020.
Our Comments
The CERS is based on a “qualifying renter’s” QRE in respect of a “qualifying property” for a “qualifying period” as those terms are defined in subsection 125.7(1) of the Act. Specifically, in order for an amount paid to be QRE, among other requirements, that amount must be paid (or payable in certain circumstances) under a written agreement entered into before October 9, 2020, or pursuant to the renewal (on substantially similar terms) or assignment of a written agreement entered into before October 9, 2020 (the “Written Agreement Requirement”).
A particular written agreement that purports to be a sublease may actually be an assignment of a lease, and vice versa. For example, in Sussex Square Apartments, [1999] 2 C.T.C. 2143 99 D.T.C. 443, the court concluded that a “sublease” of the entire term of a lease operates as an assignment, not a sublease, as there is no reversionary interest left in the original tenant.
This distinction between a sublease and an assignment may be important when determining whether an amount paid is QRE. Where amounts were paid under a lease that was assigned, the Written Agreement Requirement in the definition of QRE would be satisfied regardless of when that assignment of the lease occurred, and regardless of whether the assignment was a written agreement, so long as the lease that was assigned is a written agreement entered into prior to October 9, 2020. In contrast, for amounts paid under a sublease, the Written Agreement Requirement would only be satisfied if the sublease is itself a written agreement that was entered into prior to October 9, 2020.
Whether a document would constitute a written agreement is a question of fact depending on the language used and the terms specified in the relevant documents. A determination could only be made after a review of the documents and circumstances of each case. Generally, while there is no requirement that the documents be signed, other conditions must be present: the written documents must show a clear intention to create a binding and enforceable contractual relation, outline all the essential terms and conditions of the agreement, and demonstrate an acceptance in writing by both parties of the terms and conditions.
It is our understanding that in an actual sublease of real property, the only parties to the sublease are the sublessor and the subtenant. Unlike an assignment, the actual landlord of the real property is generally not a party to the sublease. Furthermore, depending on the circumstances, a sublease that was executed without the required consent of the landlord may still be effective and binding between the sublessor and the subtenant (i.e., a written agreement).
In the context of the facts presented in the inquiry, assuming that the sublease is an actual sublease (and not an assignment), the fact that the landlord failed to sign the sublease until October 9, 2020 would not necessarily preclude the sublease from being a written agreement entered into before October 9, 2020.
However, it should be noted that there are other factors that may affect the determination of whether the sublease at issue was a written agreement entered into prior to October 9, 2020. For example, the sublease itself may contain a condition stipulating that the agreement would not take effect until the signature of the landlord was procured. Hence, it is ultimately a question of fact whether the sublease was an assignment of a lease with the landlord, or if the sublease was a sublease, whether the sublease was a written agreement entered into prior to October 9, 2020.
We trust our comments will be of assistance.
Yours truly,
Amanda Couvrette CPA, CA
Acting Manager
For Division Director
Business and Employment Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislation Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch
UNCLASSIFIED
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without the prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2022
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistribuer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de façon électronique, mécanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2022
Video Tax News is a proud commercial publisher of Canada Revenue Agency's Technical Interpretations. To support you, our valued clients and your network of entrepreneurial, small businesses, we choose to offer this valuable resource to Canadian tax professionals free of charge.
For additional commentary on Technical Interpretations, court cases, government releases, and conference materials in a single practical document specifically geared toward owner-managed businesses see the Video Tax News Monthly Tax Update newsletter. This effective summary and flagging tool is the most efficient way to ensure that you, your firm, and your clients are fully supported and armed for whatever challenges are thrown your way. Packages start at $400/year.